Your Legal Resource

The Writings Of And About John Mccarthy - Treachery And Treason Page 5

The Writings Of And About John McCarthy - Treachery And Treason

Page 5

October 2004 - January 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Ad Submissions

LW,

Can you spell perseverance?

Wow, a busy dude! I know it's early for responses on the "McCarthy saga" but you know top secret court-martial's involving conspiracy to obstruct justice in a capital murder case during wartime and involving treason against the President by the NSC during wartime is NOT political, therefore, I would anticipate a more imaginative response to this request. Ft. Huachuca, the head of the Military Intelligence Command and School should be a treasure trove as well as Ft. Meade, Maryland and Arlington Hall, VA.

Thanks!

Bests,

John

Recap of Activity re LWB's Ad Submissions

Friday, October 22, 2004

E-Mail to Mr. Katz:

SUBJECT: Recap of Activity re LWB's Ad Submissions During the Period Sept. 24, 2004 -- Oct. 22, 2004:

(Text of ads below)

A. Blow the Whistle on Iraqnam's Battle-of-Baghdad Cover-up!

  • Submitted on 24 Sep 04 to the commander of Navy Region Mid-Atlantic for publication in the "Flagship" (via public affairs officer -- [email protected]). Rejected on Oct. 5, 2004; reason: the anti-political-ads provision of DoD Instruction 5120.4 (16 June 1997).
  • Submitted on 26 Sep 04 to the commander of Marine Corps Base Quantico, Quantico, Va., for publication in the "Sentry" (via public affairs officer -- Capt. [email protected]). Rejected via Matory's phone call to LWB on 27 Sep 04; reason: alleged conflict with the anti-"political"-ads provision of DoD Instruction 5120.4.
  • Submitted on 25 Sep 04 to the commander of the USAF 1st Fighter Wing, Langley Air Force Base, Va., for publication in the "Flyer" (via public affairs officer -- [email protected]). Awaiting Capt. Glenn's completion of his review.
  • Submitted on 25 Sep 04 to the commander of Fort Eustis, Va., for publication in the "Wheel" (via public affairs officer -- [email protected]). Rejected on Oct. 12, 2004; reason: "After careful deliberation and at the advice of the Staff Judge Advocate, the Garrison Commander has declined your request to advertise in the Wheel newspaper." -- Cindy L. Your
  • Submitted on 25 Sep 04 to the commander of Fort Lee, Va., for publication in the "Traveller" (via public affairs officer -- [email protected]). Tentatively rejected on Oct. 8, 2004 (awaiting commander's final decision); reason: "advertisement ... classified as political in nature." -- P. Sweeney
  • Submitted on 28 Sep 04 to the commander of Fort Belvoir, Va., for publication in the "Eagle" (via public affairs officer -- [email protected]). Rejected on Oct. 8, 2004; reason: "Larry, we won't be using the ad in our Command Information newspaper. Recommend you consider the commercial press as a more appropriate outlet." -- Donald N. Carr
  • Submitted on 28 Sep 04 to the commander of Andrews Air Force Base, Md., for publication in the "Capital Flyer" (via public affairs officer). Rejected on Oct. 14, 2004; reason: by an unexplained fiat of the "Capital Flyer" staff (see my entry for ad No. F(1)).
  • Submitted on 6 Oct 04 to the superintendent of the U. S. Military Academy (West Point, N.Y.) for publication in the "Pointer View" (via public affairs officer -- [email protected]). Rejected on Oct. 7, 2004; reason: "Your ad below does not clear our review process as it appears to be in conflict with the official DoD position on the matter." -- Joseph V. Tombrello
  • Submitted on 2 Oct 04 to the commander of Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, N.C., for publication in the "Globe" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 3 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Benning, Ga., for publication in the "Bayonet" (via public affairs officer). Rejected on Oct. 18, 2004; reason: "We are prohibited by Army Regulation from carrying political ads." -- Rich McDowell
  • Submitted on 3 Oct 04 to the garrison commander of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C., for publication in the "Stripe" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the commander of Scott Air Force Base, Ill., for publication in the "Command Post" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Campbell, Ky., for publication in the "Courier" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the commander of MacDill Air Force Base, Fla., for publication in the "Thunderbolt" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., for publication in the "Sunburst" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 6 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Leavenworth, Kans., for publication in the "Lamp" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 6 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Sam Houston, Texas, for publication in the "News Leader" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, for publication in the "Skywriter" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.

B. Blow the Whistle on ALL Atrocities at Abu Ghraib!

  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to Belvoir public affairs officer Donald N. Carr for publication in the "Eagle." Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 9 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Riley, Kans., for publication in the "Post" (via public affairs officer). Rejected; reason: interference with command's mission?
  • Submitted on 10 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Sill, Okla., for publication in the "Cannoneer" (via public affairs officer). Rejected; reason: interference with command's mission?
  • Submitted on 9 Oct 04 to Navy Region Mid-Atlantic public affairs officer Lt. Cdr. Robert S. Mehal for publication in the "Flagship." Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 10 Oct 04 to USMA public affairs officer Maj. Kent Cassella for publication in the "Pointer View." Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the Scott Air Force Base public affairs officer for publication in the "Command Post." Awaiting a reply.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Campbell, Ky., for publication in the "Courier" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 10 Oct 04 to the commander of Marine Corps Base Quantico, Va., for publication in the "Sentry." Awaiting a response from Capt. Matory.
  • Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the commander of MacDill Air Force Base, Fla., for publication in the "Thunderbolt." Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., for publication in the "Sunburst." Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, for publication in the "Skywriter" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.

C. Blow the Whistle on the Army-CIA McCarthy Saga!

  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to Belvoir public affairs officer Donald N. Carr for publication in the "Eagle." Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 10 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Polk, La., for publication in the "Guardian" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the Scott Air Force Base public affairs officer for publication in the "Command Post." Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 10 Oct 04 to U. S. Military Academy public affairs officer Maj. Kent Casella for publication in the "Pointer View." Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Campbell, Ky., for publication in the "Courier" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 10 Oct 04 to the commander of Marine Corps Base Quantico, Va., for publication in the "Sentry." Awaiting a response from Capt. William Matory.
  • Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the commander of MacDill Air Force Base, Fla., for publication in the "Thunderbolt." Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 11 Oct 04 to the commander of Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., for publication in the "Sunburst" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, for publication in the "Skywriter" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.

D. Join the Revolt Against the "Feres Doctrine"!

  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to Belvoir public affairs officer Donald N. Carr for publication in the "Eagle." Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Campbell, Ky., for publication in the "Courier" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 15 Oct 04 to the Fort Riley "Post" editor (Mike Heronemus). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 15 Oct 04 to Fort Sill public affairs officer N. Elliott for publication in the "Cannoneer." Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., for publication in the "Sunburst" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, for publication in the "Skywriter" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.

E. Blow the Whistle on the Military's Psychiatric Retaliation Against Whistleblowers!

  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to Belvoir public affairs officer Donald N. Carr for publication in the "Eagle." Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Fort Campbell, Ky., for publication in the "Courier" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted on 12 Oct 04 to the commander of Holloman Air Force Base, N.M., for publication in the "Sunburst" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.
  • Submitted to the commander of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, for publication in the "Skywriter" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.

F. Blow the Whistle on Commanders' Ad Censorship!

  • Submitted on 13 Oct 04 to the commander of Andrews Air Force Base, Md., for publication in the "Capital Flyer" (via public affairs officer). Rejected on Oct. 14, 2004; reason: "The Capital Flyer will not be able to support this ad [and/or the BOBCUP ad? -- LWB] in our paper." -- "Capital Flyer" staff

G. Resist the Government's Drafty Spin!

Submitted on 21 Oct 04 to the superintendent of the U. S. Air Force Academy, Colorado, for publication in the "Academy Spirit" (via public affairs officer). Awaiting a response.

Submitted on 21 Oct 04 to the commander of Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., for publication in the "Space & Missile Times" (via public affairs officer) Awaiting a response.

TEXT OF EACH OF THE SUBMITTED CLASSIFIED ADVERTISEMENTS, IN ORDER OF APPEARANCE:

A. Blow the Whistle on Iraqnam's Battle-of-Baghdad Cover-up!

A group of current/former U. S. service members -- known as the Ghost Troop (http://geocities.com/onlythecaptain/) -- has found the "bloody knife" exposing the OFFICIALLY UNRELEASED number of Americans who died during the fierce battle at Iraq's capital in the spring of 2003. That number, of course, dwarfs the officially released count. To help determine the discrepancy's cause/perpetuators/accountability, the group is seeking all related documentary evidence and sworn testimony from all BOBCUP whistleblowers brave enough to come forward. Armed with your accounts, the group can help persuade Congress to exercise its oversight authority in this matter. Contact: Larry W. Bryant at: 703-931-3341 (e-mail: [email protected]).

B. Blow the Whistle on ALL Atrocities at Abu Ghraib!

Now that the Center for Public Integrity has received "leakage" of highly incriminating documentation about the U.S.-led debacle in Iraqnam's Abu Ghraib prison (see: http://www.publicintegrity.org), you have a chance to add YOUR whistleblower voice to this expose if you (or someone you know) possess additional evidence of such gross impropriety. Contact: Larry W. Bryant at (703) 931-3341; e-mail: [email protected]

C. Blow the Whistle on the Army-CIA McCarthy Saga!

Near the end of the Vietnam war, then-special forces captain John J. McCarthy, Jr., found himself involuntarily transferred to clandestine duty with a CIA-run operation called "Project Cherry." There, close to the Cambodian border, he had no idea what lay ahead for his Army career -- and for his well-being as a U. S. citizen. That transfer resulted in his being railroaded as an expendable pawn in a rogue activity that, to this day, eludes even congressional oversight. And, even in today's wartime situation, we see that the inadequate oversight perpetuates treasonous conduct amidst the president's closest advisors, the "intelligence community." McCarthy's continuing story provides enough foreign intrigue, official skulduggery, and personal pathos to warrant an Oliver Stone-type docudrama. But before such a blockbuster exposes of official U.S.-led treachery and treason in wartime can reach the screen (and hence consign him to history as a hero rather than a villain), he needs to hear from all prospective whistleblowers brave enough to help bring to account all perpetrators of this career-ending episode in U. S. military-intelligence abuse and of its subsequent, ongoing cover-up. Contact: Larry W. Bryant at (703) 931-3341; e-mail: [email protected]

D. Join the Revolt Against the "Feres Doctrine"!

Most prospective (and too many currents) servicemembers who sign up for military service fail to realize that their doing so automatically cancels out their constitutional right to seek litigation redress for official wrongs done unto them during any period of service. This 50-some-year-old congressionally accepted dehumanizing booby trap is being challenged by a dedicated group of military veterans known as the Veterans Equal Rights Protection Advocacy (http://www.verpa.org). Of course, VERPA members keenly realize the urgency of their revolt, now that our nation's younger citizenry might face the renewal of conscription because of Iraqnam. What's more: should certain U.S.-led activity in Iraqnam ever get adjudged as criminality by a Nuremberg-styled court of inquiry, imagine how many servicemembers (and their families) will flood the ranks of "Feres" victimhood! If you (or someone you know) already have been victimized by "Feres," VERPA wants to add your account to its case for reform. Contact: Larry W. Bryant at (703) 931-3341; e-mail: [email protected]

E. Blow the Whistle on the Military's Psychiatric Retaliation Against Whistleblowers!

Supposing you've acquired hard evidence of waste/fraud/abuse (and/or cover-up thereof) during the course of your military duty, and decide to blow the whistle on that wrongdoing. Warning: be prepared for retaliation According to accounts now arriving at the website of verpa.org, certain military officials would have no compunction about requiring you to undergo a psychiatric exam, whereby the preordained results can get you administratively dismissed from service. That such abuse of publicly funded mental-health resources can occur on American soil is bad enough, but the felony gets compounded whenever any servicemember falls prey to it, for that victim has no legal right to sue its perpetrators for damages. If you (or someone you know) have been victimized by (or have witnessed) this psychiatric warfare against the bearer of bad news, now's the time to -- well -- blow the whistle on the practice. The more of you who decide to come forward with your evidence, the better such veterans groups as VERPA can help bring about reform. Contact: Larry W. Bryant at (703) 931-3341; e-mail: [email protected]

F. Blow the Whistle on Commanders' Ad-censorship!

If you (or someone you know) have experienced (and/or witnessed)official censoring of any public-interest ad submitted to this (or to any other) military newspaper, you now have a formal opportunity to help challenge that action. Your submitted evidence could lead to restoring full, unfettered, global access to this public forum called the classified-ads section. Accordingly, your whistleblower revelations will be shared discreetly with one or more specialists in First Amendment jurisprudence. Contact: Larry W. Bryant at (703) 931-3341; e-mail: [email protected]; snail-mail: 3518 Martha Custis Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302.

G. Resist the Government's Drafty Spin!

In a year or so, the "politics of conscription" will reach denouement upon the military stage of World War 2.5 (aka "United States v. Iraqnam, Iranslam, et al."). If you (or someone you know) face being drafted into this war, you have little time to assess and counter the official spin on this prospect. Keep watching this ad space for related developments and for opportunities to add your voice of reason and dissent. Contact: Larry W. Bryant at (703) 931-3341; e-mail: [email protected]

Covert/Clandestine Operations

10-30-04

Covert Operations, as mentioned in Larry O'Daniel's fine article on the Wilson/Plame Affair, below, are designed never, ever, ever to see or meet the light of day.

Clandestine Operations are "temporary" secrets, to prevent the opposition from knowing who is coming from where, and by what means for a given purpose: The Mission!

Now, an example of a Clandestine Operation would be a Special Op's unit parachuting into a 'denied' area for the purpose of destroying a dam, hydroelectric power station, a military barracks facility, or ammunition storage facility, for instance.

The reception committee, (unless the force is going in 'blind') may be a local priest who has recruited trusted indigenous folks through a cut-out to protect his own identity, to assist the force by means of guides or transportation or additional security to enhance their mission.

The Covert side of this operation is the identity of the local priest who may have been in place for an extended period of time and whose existence is above and beyond suspicion. This asset is not a 'one-time' character who is technically expendable. His value for a number of other long-range plans is paramount in the secrecy of his existence and his Covert nature.

The means by which the priest is contacted would be highly compartmentalized to ensure secure communications to initiate the means necessary to assist the force, in this case, the Special Op's team. Great care is taken NOT to compromise the existence of this covert asset. These are the sources and methods we hear so little about and the true reason for all the secrecy of the Plans side of the Agency and its assets.

Once the team arrives and maneuvers to the area of concern and the mission is accomplished, that portion of the Clandestine activity is no longer secret due to the obvious fact that a target has been destroyed or a person assassinated. There may be a secondary mission of a highly sensitive nature involved in this activity such as emplacing a nuclear device at a different location for later detonation while this operation is actually underway as a diversion.

There may be missions within a mission tightly held and known only to a few of the participants. This is where skullduggery comes home to roost but that is another matter. Suffice to say, there are inherent dangers to these Covert/Clandestine activities.

Bottom line, Covert activity is designed to enhance plausible deniability whereas Clandestine activity is temporarily "sensitive" information that can hardly be denied once completed. Infiltrating by submarine and swimming to shore is a Clandestine activity. Any assistance in the accomplishment of the mission may very well be Covert oriented. The activity of those engaged in this type of operation, regardless of its nature or sensitivity, is Clandestine.

So, you can see from the information we already know about Valerie Plame, her so-called "outing" as a Covert agent is highly improbably due to her blatant exposure in public circles BEFORE this incident, and her obvious desk job at Langley as an analyst, which would certainly not enhance your practical "covert" type of activity. The brouhaha over this political "snipe" is BS and relies on the ignorance of the masses, and most of the Intelligence Community as well! The differences between Covert and Clandestine WAS one of the earliest Intelligence classes I had as a young trooper in Special Forces. Of course, at the time, our instructors were CIA and WWII veterans of OSS. What you have today is a whole different breed of cat and that's why there is mass confusion in this matter.

Of course, those in the know are not about to straighten out the media on this issue for they are laughing all the way to the bank on this one! And that is why Larry's article is so important.

That's all the nickel knowledge I have for this Saturday.....

Bests,

John

Vote Fraud- Stolen Election

11-15-04

http://www.swans.com/library/art10/elib021.html

Gentlemen,

Eli Beckerman's article above on "Implications Of A Stolen Election" strikes a chord of disdain felt by myself and many of my colleagues. It is a matter of great concern to most of us that the record turnout of voters in Ohio, Massachusettes, and other bastions of Democratic strongholds would succumb to such previously unknown numbers of votes for the 'election' of the current administration without question or public clamor. If we observe more votes than voters, should we simply smile and say, "Vote, and vote often?" How can the votes always add up to 100% of the electorate when so many votes have been rejected for one reason or another, unmailed absentee ballots, or simply not counted?

Incomprehensible, if not impossible, some would say. Others, like Mr. Beckerman, came to the immediate and justifiable conclusion that our system of vote 'counting' leaves no doubt that fraud, manipulation, coercion, intimidation, and felonious larceny have run amok throughout the "land of the free and the home of the brave". Strangely enough, there are laws and rules on the books that deal with voter fraud, but only on the level of the voter, not those running the voting system and more specifically the counting of votes. Those who may be unfortunate enough to be in the heretofore unknown territory of vote manipulation would be immune from prosecution as there are no laws to violate. What few laws exist with respect to the voter are at the State level. Is it just a coincidence that those in power continuously shun any attempt to place comprehensive laws on the books requiring those charged with the responsibility to conduct vote counting to operate within specific guidelines? Is it just a coincidence that three critical hours of vote tabulation in Ohio are missing from the most powerful computer in the State which was run by a civilian contractor from Texas without the supervision of a neutral observer or media representative?

The stirring of the honey-bucket of "truth and lies" usually allows the stench of fraud to engulf those with only the average sense of smell.

In this instance, stirring is not necessary as the putrid odor of egregious strong-arm tactics has emersed itself into the authority of the Constitution and blocked the sweet fragrance to our sense of normalcy. Did not Stalin utter the words; "It is not who votes that counts, but rather who counts the votes"?

The 'voting' of 2004 joins the other travesties of justice accepted and condoned by our electorate and elected. The status quo of our so-called election system and our system of justice have become corrupt without recourse. But why should we be surprised when the soon-to-be ex-Attorney General has refused for the past three years to address the crimes of treason in wartime and conspiracy to obstruct justice in a capital murder case to cover up the treason? It is duly noted that thousands of US attorneys had been dispatched to 'observe' the voting procedures in various States, but to what avail?

The passive reaction to those who ran for the Democratic Ticket is incomprehensible to those of us who expected at least cries of "Foul!" and "Fraud!" Was the promise of "every vote will be counted" just part of the ruse? The silence has created a vacuum resulting in this preordained exercise becoming a charade. Is that not what has occurred here; the American Public quietly accepting the fraud of the voting mechanism?

No public clamor. No hue and cry. The corruption of our voting hood-wink amidst the ongoing treason resulting in preemptive attacks on sovereign nations justified by fabricated "intelligence" provided by those who served at the pleasure of the president only now to be forced from office in the Intelligence Community brings the 'plan' full circle. Plausible deniability rears its ugly head once more. Let's rid ourselves of those disgruntled leadership positions of CIA and State Department officials who are the silent 'fall guys' whose untimely exposure of the fraud of the Iraqi War will be met with admonitions of sour grapes too late whistleblowers. Credibility is damned! Their 'disloyalty' to Bush, albeit in the secret, compartmented channels, in providing immediate questions of concern over the legitimacy of the processed 'intelligence' offered by those sources with highly questionable motives has ultimately resulted in their removal from career positions of responsibility. Those in the know are dangerous to the exposure of corruption and fraudulent acts resulting in treason, the usurping of the Constitution, and the virtual annihilation of the possibility for Congressional Restraint of unbridled preemptive acts of war. This proves the point: "It is dangerous to be right when your government is wrong" --Voltaire.

Roll over, America. You have just taken it in the shorts. And now that the music has ended, the blood baths have begun and the public clamor has been stifled. These are times reminiscent of the shades of Europe, 1933 when those who dared to question the absolutely obvious facts that a country was going to hell in a handbag of illusions, skullduggery, and outright fraud were met with the original 'Patriot Act'.

Once again, those who have raised the voices of concern over the war in Iraq and the so-called 'election' will be shouted down as we were during and after the war in Vietnam: "Forget about it! It's over. Get over it! That's old news! Stay in the middle of the road! Get on the team!" It wasn't until more than twenty years later that the truth about the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution was exposed. Had that information been made available via such a system as the Internet back then, certainly the rally would have been effective against the advance to the conflict in South East Asia.

Our Country Right or wrong? Is our arrogance dangerous? Who's to challenge us, the only Super Power?

Only ourselves.

Otherwise, we are witness to the erosion of our alleged position as leader of the "Free World", the glue that brings the cohesiveness to nations of truth, the demise of the bastion of world democracy, and the fearsome and unbridled evolution of the aggressor nation.

The following is a reality check from the remarks of former Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, acting as a lead prosecutor before the Nuremberg International War Crimes Tribunal in 1946:

"WE MUST NEVER FORGET THAT THE RECORD ON WHICH WE JUDGE THESE DEFENDANTS TODAY IS THE RECORD ON WHICH HISTORY WILL JUDGE US TOMORROW."

Dare we face the music and challenge the wolves of war who would rid us of our Rights? Or will we dance as a nation of sheep and follow this Judas Goat to the slaughterhouse of the tyrant?

God Bless America might very well evolve into May God Forgive America.

It was easy to say "No!" before the war but now it requires moral courage to have the people speak out against the blatant and unrelenting effects of the so-called Patriot Act I. The Amendment to the precancerous effects of Patriot Act I is Patriot Act II. Both are virtual copies of the "Reichstagsbrandverordnung", followed by the "Ermächtigungsgesetz"; two connected Enabling Laws of Hitler's attempt to thwart all previous Rights and Privileges of the German people which ultimately created the requirement of neighbor spying on a neighbor for the State and ultimately voided the Weimarer Verfassung (Constitution). The fear factor of terrorism and Communism was drilled into the population with the expected results. Can anyone say, déjà vu? http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~jobrien/reference/ob60.html

The creation and passage of the above law and the Patriot Act I was voted into law without those voting having hardly read the document, much less debate it due to time constraints. The time frame of the passage of the Enabling Law in Germany in 1933 after the Reichstagsbrand (Fire) equates to the time frame of the passage of the Patriot Act I after 9/11. This is no coincidence because the time necessary for the compilation of the Patriot Act required it to be written well before 9/11. The script must have been written beforehand and adjusted to the final version passed within 6 weeks, on October 24, 2001.

http://www.epic.org/privacy/terrorism/hr3162.html

You may refer to the following draft of Patriot Act II, below, for comparison to the Enabling Laws above.

http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/patriot2-hi.pdf

Who should know better about the evolution of these laws than George Bush? Grandfather Prescott Bush and George Herbert Walker supported Hitler during the period when the Enabling Laws were quickly pushed through the parliamentary process in 1933. It worked once, why not again?

(--> Trading With The Enemy Act,

http://www.lpdallas.org/features/draheim/dr991216.htm,

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,100474,00.html)

This application for the removal of Civil Rights and the eradication of the Constitution of Germany worked so well, it has been duplicated by the passing of the Patriot Act. Even the title of this effort to erode the Constitution smacks of obvious propaganda as there is nothing patriotic in its concept nor its intended purpose. What lurks within the framework of this Act is unmitigated treachery.

Approval of Patriot Act II would disallow the questioning of voting irregularities, the eradication of the Posse Comitatus Act http://www.dojgov.net/posse_comitatus_act.htm, the enactment of Marshall Law and the end to life and freedom as we know it. We would become the land of the enslaved, unable to question the authority of any kind and at the mercy of those enforcing the will of a tyrant. The jackbooted thugs of our worst dreams would become a reality like Waco and Ruby Ridge and our Constitution moot, a relic of the past, a memory to be eradicated and eventually stamped out of existence thereby allowing one-party rule similar to the Nazi system.

The removal of Civil Liberties and other inalienable rights makes a mockery of our Constitution which would read more like the rules in George Orwell's Animal Farm. Additionally, the new enaction and interpretation of the laws of justice and their application in dealing with so-called 'tribunals' as an instrument in dealing with terrorism would further erode the legitimacy of all courts. Orwell would be so proud.

Mr. Beckerman writes of the necessity to rebuild America. Certainly, we can do that, but only after we recognize the erroneously contrived conditions mentioned above and remedy them by necessary means.

Regards,

John McCarthy

Also worthy of reading:

Ohio Vote Fraud: More Bush "Voters" Than Residents

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/index.cfm

Evidence of Electoral Fraud in the 2004 U.S. Presidential Election: A Reading List

http://www.opednews.com/keefer_111504_readings.htm

Not So Subtle Terror

This is a perfect example of the intelligence communities solution to current problems; Black Terror--under Covert Conditions--to create an atmosphere of unbridled hatred and blame against an element with no responsibility for the senseless murder of a woman who spoke the language, married an Iraqi, assisted tens of thousands of people who otherwise would not have survived and for what? Propaganda. This is an act reminiscent of similar atrocities undertaken during the Vietnam War for political purposes. Blame this atrocious act on innocent parties for nefarious reasons. All this despite unanimous cries from all insurgent elements in Fallujah demanding her release? This is "intelligence"? Hardly, this is but another war crime, disguised as 'terror', 'assassination, and 'war is hell'. The pattern for this type of behavior is buried in the annals of the records of those currently in power in Iraq AND the US. Is it not obvious what has happened here or do so many wishes to bury their heads in the sands of ignorance, again? "My country would never do such a thing". HA!

Now it makes sense why such issues are cloaked with the classification of 'top secret', never to see the light of day, never to be 'down graded' which would allow historians to view the hypocrisy of the 'intelligence community' committing crimes against humanity for the purpose of 'just win, baby' and worse.

So, where are the WMD anyway? Oh, I just remembered, the OIL is the WMD!

John

Examine THIS!

(response to The Military's Psychiatric Attack Against Whistleblowers, Dissidents, et al. By Larry W. Bryant)

11-23-04

LW, Shades of Leavenworth, mon ami. During August of 1968, after exercising my so-called Rights of not working in any capacity not commensurate with my rank; cook, decal printing, woodworking, and resorting to reading anything I could get my hands on from the limited library selection at the USDB, a Sergeant Blue of the Psychiatric Section came by my domicile to quietly inform me that a discussion was then underway by the staff psychiatrists whose options included placing me into a straight jacket, medicating me with a substance strong enough to keep me asleep until I could be transferred to Fitzimmons Army Hospital in Denver, Colorado, for mind regression treatment and, if that was unsuccessful, a frontal lobotomy, thus rendering me incompetent to speak of the highly classified activities (which later turned out to be treasonous) resulting in my incarceration, to begin with.

I notified my Congressman, John Rhodes of Arizona, who, in turn, notified Secretary of the Army Stanley Resor, which halted this hideous option.

Sgt Blue stated that the major reason for this option was my refusal to be rehabilitated, noncooperation with the staff in his office (who were not cleared for the information they wanted to discuss), and complaints of being forced to wear other inmates underwear. Oh, my. How dare I complain!

Even though I maintained my rank, pay, and allowances and continued to serve as a commissioned officer in the United States Army, I was constantly reminded I was a "prisoner" and therefore of such a status that I had no rights whatsoever.

All this was taking place while attorney F. Lee Bailey, with a bevy of reporters and cameramen, was refused entrance to the military penitentiary and access to me because he was not my attorney of record. All this while another attorney was undergoing a six-month background check to determine if he was cleared for access to the so-called sensitive information contained in my trial record. All this precluded my appeals from being heard as I had no attorney of my choice for this process; limbo.

When I conveyed this information to my military attorney by phone from the 'secure' phone booth in the JAG office in Leavenworth, the tape recorder malfunctioned, feedback came over the line which promptly went dead. So much for attorney-client protection.

What a lovely bunch of coconuts!

Bests,

John

JFK

1-12-05

Thanks, Justin

Lots of my opinions are based on the following source. Ironically, I was arrested four years and one day after JFK was assassinated. I had been in the Alps on the German Austrian border emplacing a clandestine radio system when JFK was murdered in Dallas.

http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ST/ST.html

100,000 copies of this book, now a free download, were removed from the bookstore shelves across this country, the land of the free and home of the brave.

Please take the time to peruse this info. It is the bible on such matters. Prouty, the author, passed away two years ago. A tremendous loss.

Thanks for your kind words.

John

CIA

1-12-2005

John - When you were in Cherry, did the Agency tell you that if captured, with your documentation, you were an illegal combatant, not entitled to Geneva Protections? Larry

No, I was so compartmentalized from the agency and the Embassy, I was not allowed in those areas. They were very extensive in their self-protection for a rogue operation. Adams served as the cut-out. He only went there in civvies. We were not even allowed to go to B-57 except in emergency cases. They did not communicate shit to us. Deniability!!!!!! Just gave us Embassy ID and new names. Terrific! I guess that's what you do when you run a rogue operation, eh? Lessons learned. And remember, we were forbidden to openly associate with ANY US military, much less SF, in Vietnam. We had an emergency radio at the safe house just a mile outside ton-son taht. But no, no instructions whatsoever. Our cover of being a DOD field evaluation team was supposed to suffice. Ha! As soon as they threatened to sodomize me ala Abu Ghraib, I guess I would have told them my name, rank, serial number, and location of my unit. Screw them!

Bests,

John

1-12-2005

Thanks -- FYI - Cherry is about to be discussed again - this time outside of DOJ and will go to the highest levels of government I can get it too. However, this time, it will be discussed in terms of why DOD should take over paramilitary ops from the CIA. I have every reason to believe it will get the attention that it did not before because of certain recent activities I have been involved in that I can prove I was involved in - even though I am not government-connected. Cherry will be discussed, not as we did before, as part of your case directly, but as part of why the CIA has to be taken out of the field because they ran rogue operations, hid rogue operations, and still hide rogue operations - and Cherry is proof of that. Take care - Larry (DOJ will eventually become aware of it because of the nature of the project - and it will be mentioned that DOJ did nothing to help the situation (ala our letter to Ashcroft and follow-up)

1-12-2005

It should be pointed out that the CIA, in its zeal to protect those with Treason in Wartime hanging over their heads, resorted to conspiring to obstruct justice in a capital murder case to cover the treason! No wonder the DOD directive for the automatic downgrading of the top-secret record of the trial was ruled "not in effect" How quaint. Good luck with your efforts, Larry.

Bests,

John

Treason In Wartime

in response to the article "No peace on Earth during the unjust war"

December 24, 2004, BY ANDREW GREELEY

Greetings Father Greeley and a Merry Christmas to you.

Following are URLs containing once top-secret documents and other information declassified by the State Department in 2000, much to the chagrin of the CIA. Now we know why; treason in wartime.

These documents are important in that they show a pattern of behavior on the part of the intelligence community and those who control them for fabricating information to justify preemptive wars on sovereign nations for nefarious reasons. We have become the aggressor nation. It is no more glaring than in the arrogance for continued war in Iraq.

Recently, Gary Webb took his own life in utter frustration for what his industry did to him. That is the media. Gary had written DARK ALLIANCE for the San Jose Mercury News re the cocaine smuggling by the CIA to subvert the will of Congress that the Nicaraguan conflict NOT be monetarily supported by the United States. Gary paid a bitter price. Even in death, he was vilified by the press for exposing the CIA, crossing that line, showing that moral courage to expose the black hand of hypocrites who operate outside our Constitution and against our laws to subvert the will of the people.

Why not take back our country, our Constitution, and rid ourselves of this growing scourge? Are we not obligated to remove such cancer and restore democracy? Or are we truly living George Orwell's Animal Farm? Are we that nation of sheep following the Judas Goat (My Pet Goat) to the slaughterhouse of tyranny?

When we will have had enough of rape and torture in the prisons of Iraq, perpetrated by Americans? When will we no longer hear the screams at Abu Ghraib of those mothers forced to watch their sons being sodomized by Americans?

How many CIA were dressed in military uniforms in charge of the torture at these prisons throughout the world? This is the modus operandi from the Vietnam War, as you will see below. Sources and methods are damned!

And is it any wonder that NONE of this documented evidence has seen the light of day in the US media? Is it any wonder that all this damning information falls on deaf ears and blind editors? Egregious you say? Read on.

Peruse these documents and see the patterns that emerge which continue to this very day. Witness the blatant disregard for Presidential Directives issued during National Security Council meetings resulting in chaos and mayhem. See the unanswered letters to Senators on the Intelligence Committee and the letters to the Attorney General facing the same fate.

Is there a greater crime than treason in wartime? Is it any wonder that the media is complacent with the will of the government instead of its watchdog? Does this not smack of the ruse of the Gulf of Tonkin incident?

We have broken all of the rulings handed down at the International Nuremberg War Crimes Trials. Former Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson became the Chief Prosecutor at Nuremberg and uttered these words in 1946 while seeking the death penalty for those defendants. "The standards by which we judge these defendants today will be the standards by which we shall be judged tomorrow". Hypocrisy has come home to roost and its feathers are soaked with blood and oil from Iraq.

And if this is not enough, take a few moments to view the pages of this banned book, yes banned from the bookstore shelves across this country, the land of the free and home of the brave. The Secret Team, the CIA, and its allies in control of the united states and the world. 100,000 copies of this book have been confiscated. The CIA cannot stand the written word.

Rage Report

Re: Spy chief says 200,000 fighters in Iraq

January 3, 2005

Unfortunately, those 'part timers' are the nucleus for 'guerrilla warfare, the Resistance's support. I don't think it will be advantageous to count their numbers in the hundreds of thousands. I do believe we will be facing support in the millions. This in itself will lead to civil war exponentially greater than that witnessed in Serbo/Croatia or South East Asia combined.

Damn, we are good!

Sometimes it is quite dangerous and foolish to believe one's own propaganda regarding the opposition's potential.

One day in 1966, a reinforced company of paratroopers from the 101st Airborne Division were called off of a mountain top in Vietnam. As they walked to the bottom of the valley at sling arms and eating breakfast of C Rations out of cans, they walked into an ambush.

I was in the recovery team that was allocated to recover the remains of 180 dead Americans.

The two villages in the valley had been evacuated. The eyes and ears of the US had been removed.....

And the complicity and arrogance of those in leadership positions got all killed. It happened more than once.

So let's not allow the figures spewed out by those with rose-colored glasses to create false security for those Oscillating Richards twisting in the wind......definition by request on the meaning of 'OR'.

Sometimes, "Intelligence" can be produced by certifiable idiots whose deductions can not and will not be questioned.

And now in Iraq, we have lost 1400+ KIA (if you believe the numbers posted by the Pentagon)--and 10,000 wounded-- but those are pithy numbers for the tens of thousands yet to die and the hundreds of thousands yet to be wounded, on our side.....there are virtually millions ready to follow the dictates of the Koran---"Behead all Invaders and non-believers".

We have yet to observe the 'meaning' of Resistance, née insurrectionists, terrorists, bandits, and dissidents!

Wake up! And smell the coffee.....has the tsunami taken Iraq out of the news?

Has Electromagnetic Weaponry, capable of actuating earthquakes, not been available since 1990?

Are we getting used to casualty rates in the hundreds of thousands?

All due respect to Mr. Bruce Hoffman quoted above, who works for the RAND Corporation, but that outfit is the old Research and Development CIA think tank HQ in Santa Monica, CA. He must have been a great "advisor" to be now pontificating from my neighborhood in Sunny California. Take that for what it's worth.

Bests,

John

Homeless and Jobless Vets

1-14-2005

Sir,

Now that we are upset with the treatment of our service members and veterans, we take a closer look at information re a COMMON DREAMS article from Jan 10, 05.

Men and Women in service have our support regardless. It's the poor souls lucky enough to have been discarded or lucky enough to still be alive, but limping or blind or crazy who are now jobless, homeless, and without the support of the VA who can not or will not demand funds for these unsung hero's who feel nothing but undeserved shame because they can't cope after carrying uncle Sam's guns off to war for nothing!

Nothing worse than walking down the street, alone, and looking for a job and a place to sleep, jumping at cars backfiring, looking over one's shoulder by instinct, fearful of going in or out of crowds. Man, this sucks. Where are the drugs? So, you settle for booze, and then who wants to interview you for even menial labor? How utterly devastating and no one cares.....that's what hurts. You've given your innocence for an uncaring nation who CLAIMS to be indebted for your service and yet the reality of the situation is bleak. And bleaker.

Well, if we are going to spend another 15-20 Billion more THIS MONTH on IRAQI propaganda crapola, where is just 10 % of that amount to care for the lost souls who made up the numbers of 150,000 men and women in combat or harms way in Iraq over the past 18 months plus? Priorities? You want to talk priorities!!!!!

To top it all off, a State Department spokesperson said in a televised news conference on Jan 13, 2005, that all US military would be out of Iraq by the end of 2005!!!! That statement flies in the face of the VA saying we can expect several more years of deployments to Iraq/Afghanistan.

Let's get on the same page, fellas.

Who painted this scenario anyway?

Bests,

John McCarthy

President and Chairman of The Board of VERPA

Veterans Equal Rights Protection Advocacy

Image of The Writings Of And About John Mccarthy - Treachery And Treason Page 5